Short Life Lights Using Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs)

Light emitting diodes (LEDs) are electronic components that produce light without heat or the use of high voltages. Their long life, low power consumption, and rapidly falling prices make them increasingly popular for Christmas lights.

Unfortunately, LED holiday lighting doesn't necessarily keep the promise that it makes.

This page examines a LED-based Christmas lighting product that has an unexpectedly short life time.

WARNING - This page is under construction!

----------
----------
 

The Product - LED Icicle Stars

The product is a string of 70 LED lamps, each of which illuminates a clear plastic star that is attached to the lamp, and hanging in the style of icicle lights.

 

Christmas 2005

Christmas 2005 had
Wal-Mart offering NOMA-branded "LED Icicle-Style Stars" in a choice of white or "ice blue".

Front of the box, Christmas 2005 at Wal-Mart.

Back of the box, Christmas 2005 at Wal-Mart.

Barcode on the box, Christmas 2005 at Wal-Mart.

Digital reconstruction of the Christmas 2005 UCC-12 (UPC-A) barcode from http://www.upcdatabase.com.

 

Christmas 2006

Christmas 2006 had
Wal-Mart offering "LED Star Icicle Light Set" under the "Holiday Time" brand, in a choice of white or blue.

Front of the box, Christmas 2006 at Wal-Mart.

Back of the box, Christmas 2006 at Wal-Mart.

Barcode on the box, Christmas 2006 at Wal-Mart.

Digital reconstruction of the Christmas 2006 UCC-12 (UPC-A) barcode from http://www.upcdatabase.com.

 

Inventory

After it became clear that I was dealing with a systematic failure in a large number of lighting sets, I started gathering information about all the sets that I have. I started by assigning a "tracking number" to each lighting set.
my information manufacturer tag UL tag
tracking number packaging file number model number issue number date
1 Christmas 2005 P-6625 04/05
2 Christmas 2005 P-6625 04/05
3 Christmas 2005 P-6625 04/05
4 Christmas 2005 P-6625 04/05
5 Christmas 2005 P-6625 04/05
6 Christmas 2005 E205237 XL-UO70BSLI2 P-6625 04/05
7 Christmas 2005
8 Christmas 2005
9 Christmas 2006 E205237 XL-UO70BASLI2 P-8385 08/05
10 Christmas 2006 E205237 XL-UO70BASLI2 P-7424 05/05

 

Who Made The Product?

Boxes

The
Christmas 2005 packaging said:
The trademark NOMA is a registered trademark of Noma O.P. Inc. and Inliten, LLC is a licensed user of the mark.

Manufactured for Inliten, LLC, Glenview, IL 60025

www.inliten.com.

Made in China

A little searching on the web revealed that NOMA was, at one time, the largest maker of holiday lighting in the United States. Faced with stiff competition from cheap labor overseas, the company was bought and sold several times. NOMA now exists as a trademark licensed to Inliten, LLC.

The web site for Inliten was not very informative. The Inliten web site did yield a contact e-mail address that did not bounce, but got no reply.

A bit of searching on the web got me this address:

Inliten LLC
2350 Ravine Way
Glenview, IL (Illinois) 60025-7621
Phone: (847) 729-9628

The Christmas 2006 packaging said:

Marketed by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Bentonville, AR 72716

MADE IN CHINA

Shop at Walmart.com

OK, so Wal-Mart sells it. But who makes it?

Hint: The UCC-12 (UPC-A) barcode on the 2006 product begins with the same GS1 Company Prefix as the 2005 product.

Barcodes

The 2005 package carries the UCC-12 (UPC-A) barcode 028208977993. I fed this to the UPC Database (http://www.upcdatabase.com) and it said:
The UPC you were looking for currently has no record in the database.
The manufacturer of this item is "NOMA INTERNATIONAL, INC.".

The 2006 package carries the UCC-12 (UPC-A) barcode 028208977399. I fed this to the UPC Database (http://www.upcdatabase.com) and it said:

The UPC you were looking for currently has no record in the database.
The manufacturer of this item is "NOMA INTERNATIONAL, INC.".

OK, the 2006 and 2005 products came from the same company. But who is that?

GS1 US organization has a barcode lookup service called GEPIR (http://www.ucc-gepir.org/GEPIR_UCCNET/jsp/client.jsp) It yielded this:

NOMA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
2350 RAVINE WAY
Suite 300
Glenview, IL
60025
US

Underwriters Laboratories Certification

U.L. file number Company Name
E205237 Excellence Optoelectronics Inc

I went to the Underwriters Laboratories online certification directory (http://database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1FRAME/index.htm) and searched for "file number" of "E205237".

Number of hits: 1

Company Name

Category Name

Link to File

EXCELLENCE OPTOELECTRONICS INC

Strings, Decorative Lighting

DGZZ.E205237

The DGZZ.E205237 link led to a page with this:

EXCELLENCE OPTOELECTRONICS INC
5TH FL 1 CREATION RD II
HSINCHU SCIENCE PARK
HSINCHU, 300 TAIWAN
(Reprinted from the Online Certifications Directory with permission from Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Copyright © 2007 Underwriters Laboratories Inc.®)

Conclusion

Putting it all together, we believe that Inliten LLC is primarily responsible for the product.

Inliten probably designed the product and had it manufactured overseas by Excellence Optoelectronics Inc.

Inliten licensed the NOMA brand and uses it on some of its products. Other products may be carry the house brand of prominent retailers.

Along with the NOMA brand name, Inliten got the rights to use the NOMA company identifier, which saved Inliten from having to register new barcodes (which costs money).

 

Mechanical Design

Lamp Assembly

Each LED in the string has mounted on top of it a clear plastic star.

Note the plastic tab in the lower left. This helps keep the lamp in place, and insures correct polarity.

(Actually, the clip doesn't insure correct polarity; you can push a lamp into the socket rotated 180 degrees, and it would make electrical contact. But the clip wouldn't fasten. So this feature makes incorrect polarity evident, not impossible.)

The exact angle at which the star is mounted on the LED lamp is not important.

This photo shows two lamps with the retaining/polarizing clip facing the same direction (toward the camera), but the stars are mounted at different angles.

But for the most part, the mounting of the stars on the LED lamp is quite uniform.

This is what the LED lamp assembly looks like out of its holder.

There are actually two versions of the lamp assembly. This one has a short plastic base. Another version has a long plastic stem sticking out of the base of the lamp holder. (I'll call these "short-base" and "long-stem" lamp assemblies.)

Here are samples of short-base and long-stem lamp assemblies.

The long stem is presumably to prevent the use of a LED lamp in a socket intended for common incandescent lights.

Note: a short-base lamp can fit in a long-stem socket, but a long-stem lamp can't fit in a short-base socket.

It seems that the first and last LED lamp in each series circuit of 35 lamps is short-base, and all the remaing lamps are long-stem.

This is a simplified drawing of how the LED lamp assembly breaks down.

Both short-base and long-stem lamp assemblies are polarized the same way: LED cathode towards the tab.

Sockets

Most of the sockets used in the light set are simple two-conductor sockets. These are used to implement a long series circuit of LEDs.

The overall light set contains exactly four sockets that have three leads sticking out. These sockets have two of the three leads connected together.

In this case, the two leads on the right are in parallel.

These special sockets are used to begin and end each series circuit of LEDs.

Here are the first two sockets in an average light set.

Note the first 3-lead socket and the 2-lead socket, instances of which make up most of the series circuit.

String

The set of 70 LED lamps is wired as two series circuits, each of which contains 35 lamps in series. Each of the series circuits is arranged in 10 "drops", which represent the icicles. The set begins with a plug, which has a piggyback socket and internal 3-Amp fuse. The set ends with a socket, used to chain together multiple light sets.

The whole light set is wired like this:

We actually took the time to count the number of LEDs in several sets, noting how many lamps were in each icicle "drop".
cable layout
tracking number connector number of LEDs in each icicle wire number of LEDs in each icicle connector comments
1 plug 5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2 2-wire 4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3 socket
2 plug 5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2 2-wire 4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3 socket
3 plug 5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2 2-wire 4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3 socket
4 plug 5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2 2-wire 4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3 socket
5 plug 5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2 2-wire 4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3 socket
6 plug 5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2 2-wire 4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3 socket one LED completely missing plastic star
7 plug 2-wire socket
8 plug 2-wire socket
9 plug 5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2 2-wire 4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3 socket
10 plug 5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3,4,2 2-wire 4,3,5,2,4,3,5,2,4,3 socket one string contains 34 LEDs instead of 35

 

Electrical Design

Overall

The strings are marked:

The household line in the United states is sometimes called 110 VAC and sometimes 120. Here are some details:
location nominal RMS voltage peak voltage peak-to-peak voltage
United States 120 V 170 V 340 V
With 35 LED lamps in a string, each lamp is subject to 4.86 volts, which is the peak voltage (170 V), divided by 35. This is both the forward and reverse voltage. Since I didn't find any rectifier diode, it would appear that the reverse current is limited to whatever leaks through the LEDs.

LED Electrical Characteristics

Each string of lights contains a packet with a spare fuse and two spare lamps. The light strings have a tag that mentions the spare lamps, saying "use only 3.4 Volt LED accessories packaged with this product."

A 3.4 Volt forward voltage drop is a reasonable figure, since many blue LEDs drop 3.4 Volts and 430 nM bright blue types range between 3.5-3.8 Volts.

The rest of this section is reserved for actual measurements of LED electrical characteristics.

year lamp base forward voltage reverse current
2005 good LED short-base
2005 good LED long-stem
2005 dim LED long-stem
2005 dead LED long-stem
2006 good LED short-base
2006 good LED long-stem
2006 dim LED long-stem
2006 dead LED long-stem

Notes:

LED Optical Characteristics

We have noticed two interesting things about the light output by the LED lamps in this product:

We think that it would be interesting to examine the output spectra of good and dim lamps.

Patents

I used Google Patents (http://www.google.com/patents) to search for patents invented by Michael Sugar or assigned to Inliten. None of these patents are specific to LED-based lighting.

Searching for "Excellence Optoelectronics", the actual manufacturer of the product, produced a small number of hits that were not germane.

I also did some searching for patents specific to LED-based lighting, and got numerous hits. Unfortunately, quite a few of them appear to be stupid patents of obvious things. In particular, US Pat. 6461019 (and its continuations) seems to be particularly broad.

 

Technical Information From Inliten

We have suessfully contacted Inliten. During telephone and e-mail exchanges we have requested technical data on the product numerous times. We have goten very little of what we have asked for.

Information Provided So Far

Information Desired

It might seem that this list is rather long. That's becase we started out with a short list, and lack of answers or unsatisfactory answers led us to new questions. As an example, when we discovered a light set with one less lamp than there should be, we came to be concerned about what design features might protect against this situation.

Why Should Inliten Give You Any Information?

 

How We Used The Product

Christmas 2005 Purchase

We first saw this product on the shelves at
Wal-Mart, while preparing for Christmas 2005. It looked OK, but not something that we would be likely to buy - mostly because we are not partial to icicle-style lights.

We bought a box, basically on speculation that it might turn out nice, and out of our abiding interest in LED lighting technology.

But when we got the box home and tried the product in operation, we were enchanted by the pale blue light. It conveyed the feel of moonlight reflecting off of ice. When we saw it, we knew that we had to get more of those lights!

We went back to Wal-Mart and found no more lights. We ended up visiting every Wal-Mart store that we knew.

Christmas 2005 Use

We ended up installing 5 of the strings indoors, running around the top of the ceiling.

The lights were left on 24 x 7, through the Christmas season and beyond. We noticed that a few lamps went out, but didn't worry much about them (other than promptly replacing them with the spares that were included). Eventually, we ran out of spares and just let the lights run. Finally, turned off the lights and unplugged them. But we left them in place for the next year. We estimate that the lights were in continuous operation for four months.

Christmas 2006 Purchase

While preparing for Christmas 2006, we saw a similar product, in a different box, on the shelves at Wal-Mart.

Despite the unresolved issues with the 2005 product, bought the only two strings we could find.

Christmas 2006 Use

The two strings of lights were hung up and run continuously for about a week, then turned off.

No failures were noted.

Extended Burn-In Of 2006 Product

On 02/03/2007, we began extended burn-in testing of the 2006 product, to see if it fails the same way as the 2005 product.

Previously, the two strings of lights were hung up and run continuously for about a week (~170 hours), then turned off. No failures were noted.

When we began this new run, a quick visual examination showed that some of the lamps had already changed from pale blue output to the darker, dimmer blue that seems to be the first step in failure.

 

Electrical Failures

 

Failure Modes

We have observed the following failure modes with this lighting product:
  1. Reduced light output and color shift.
  2. Flickering.
  3. Lamp goes dark.
It seems that the failures follow the sequence listed above - At first, the color and light output changes, then the lamp starts to flicker, then the lamp goes out.

This process may take days or even weeks to complete. Which lamps in the string fail seems to be random - some never fail.

This terribly blurry photo nonetheless shows two LED lamps with different colors and intensity.

When new, all the LED lamps are a bright pale blue, like the blob in the upper right.

When the LED lamp starts to fail, the brightness is reduced and the color becomes a darker blue, like the blob in the lower left.

 

Frequency Of Failures

Given our use: We experienced the following failures:
tracking number operating hours dead lamps
1 ~2880 19
2 ~2880 27
3 ~2880 13
4 ~2880 22
5 ~2880 23
6 0 0
7
8
9 ~170 0
10 ~170 0
(Where: a "failure" means the LED lamp is not lit at all; all operating times are approximate.)

Of the five strings that failed:
dead lamps
best string 13
worst string 27
average string 20.8

 

Could It Just Be A Bad Batch?

It is very unlikely that the failures we experienced were due to a "lemon" string, or even a bad batch.

The product was hard to find in Christmas 2006. We scoured many Wal-Mart stores, and bought our stock wherever we could find them - several different stores.

If the product failure does end up being traced to a bad batch of components, it must have been a very large batch!

 

Is That Really A Big Problem?

But lamps go out all the time. Is this such a big issue?

LED lighting products sell for a premium price over the traditional incandescent products. This premium price is justified many ways on the box:

It is the claim of long life that is the most important, because both the 2005 and 2006 boxes assign an actual number - 25,000 hours.

There are many ways to interpret such lifetime figures. To me, I take the consumer view that the entire string should last approximately 25,000 hours. That's 2.85 years of continuous operation, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

As the end of life approaches, it would be reasonable for a few lamps to burn out, but not so many that the consumer would think "It's ugly/broken/exhausted."

And that's the big problem - too many LED lamps have burned out too early. To me, the light string looks ugly/broken/exhausted after just a few months, not after the promised time span of years.

There's just no way that the claim of 25,000 hours is true.

And since the long lifetime is a substantial part of the reason for buying this product, the whole thing seems like a fraud.

 

Failure Analysis

So, what went wrong?

We suspect failures on several levels.

 

Electrical Issues

A sporadic failure, scattered here and there, might be indicative of poor quality parts or manufacturing defects in the final product. But when the failures are so widespread, it strongly suggests a design problem.

We think that it's just a case of bad electrical design - or several design errors.

Excess Voltage

A tag included on the light set suggest a forward voltage drop of 3.4 Volts per LED. This is a reasonable figure.

Interestingly, 3.4 Volts times the 35 LEDs in each series circuit is equal to 119 Volts, which is close to the nominal RMS voltage in the United States. But the peak voltage in the United States is 170 Volts (not counting the occasional surge).

So, at the peak of the A.C. cycle, each lamp is subject to 4.86 Volts - well over their 3.4 Volt rating.

Increasing Failure Rate (Avalanche Failure)

We suspect that, when these LEDs fail, they fail shorted. Thus each failure increases the voltage on surviving LEDs. The increased load on the surviving LEDs makes them fail sooner.

In other words, each failure promotes more failures in a chain-reaction or avalanche.

This is probably why one of the tags says that burned-out bulbs should be replaced promptly to avoid danger of overheating.

Of course, we did replace burned-out lamps - until we ran out of spares!

But the concern here is that each failure that is not replaced will cause the next failure to happen sooner.

No Current Limiting

There is no visible current limiting resistor, or other mechanism to limit the forward current through the LEDs.

There might be something in the circuit to serve this purpose - perhaps in the special short-base lamps. But if current limiting is implemented, we haven't found it yet.

No Reverse Bias Protection

We have seen no sign of anything to protect the LEDs from being reverse biased.

The lighting string appears to be just a bunch of Light Emitting Diodes in series, hung across the A.C. line. We see no rectifier diode that keeps the LEDs from being reverse-biased; the LEDs themselves are being used as rectifiers, but they leak when reverse-biased, causing a substantial reverse current flow.

There might be something in the circuit to serve this purpose - perhaps in the special short-base lamps. But if protection is implemented, we haven't found it yet.

 

Manufacturing Quality Issues

 

Business Procedures Issues

It may well be true that an individual LED lamp has a projected lifetime of 25,000 hours (some may last longer, others shorter). But if the LED lamp is used to build a final product with a bad design, the LED lamp might not reach its projected lifetime.

We have come to the conclusion that, in addition to the electrical design issues, Inliten has a problem with its business procedures. Inliten evidently did not test their completed product to insure that it met the claims on the package (e.g. 25,000 hour product life).

This is rather like selling a car with a miles-per-gallon claim that was calculated from the efficiency ratings of individual components. If the components were assembled properly, the calculation might well be in the ballpark. But, in order to be sure, you actually have to take the car for a drive!

 

Other Possible Issues

Thinking ahead, here are some other issues that might arise with related products.

 

What Is This Web Site Doing About It?

We have begun a series of escalating steps that are intended to:

action status
Contacting Inliten begun 12/09/2006
Contacting Wal-Mart begun 01/14/2007
Putting Up This Page done

 

Contacting Inliten

We believe that every manufacturer cares deeply about customer safety and satisfaction. We felt that Inliten would gladly investigate any issues surrounding an important product like this. We also felt that we owed it to Inliten to give them the first chance to resolve our issues.

So we tracked down the e-mail address for Inliten, sent them an e-mail, and got no reply.

After waiting a while, we sent another e-mail, which got no reply.

By the time that we wrote the third e-mail, we were getting concerned that the strange flickering of some lights in the string might indicate something more serious than a light just going out.

Since Inliten has not replied to any of our inquiries, we have taken additional steps, as described below.

Summary of communication with Inliten:
date we sent response
12/09/2006 e-mail to service@inliten.com none
12/14/2006 e-mail to service@inliten.com none
12/21/2006 e-mail to service@inliten.com none
01/14/2007 paper mail sent to Inliten too early to tell

For more, please see Investigation Time Line.

 

Putting Up This Page

Let's face it - The Internet is a powerful communication medium. Since we control a prominent (although niche) web site, we decided to leverage it to get the word out that the Inliten product does not live up to expectations and solicit input from those who have more information.

So, if any of our readers happen to know something about poor lifetime of LED lighting products, especially holiday lighting, we would appreciate it if you would share this information by contacting us.

 

Contacting Wal-Mart

Wal-Mart didn't make the defective lighting products but, like a manufacturer, we believe that every retailer cares deeply about customer safety and satisfaction.

Furthermore, for Christmas 2006, Wal-Mart sold the same lighting product in boxes marked with the Wal-Mart name. We believe that this product was manufactured by Inliten for Wal-Mart. But the use of Wal-Mart packaging places Wal-Mart a role akin to that of manufacturer.

We feel that Wal-Mart should gladly investigate any issues surrounding an important product like this. We also feel that we owe it to Wal-Mart to give them a chance to resolve our issues.

Even if Wal-Mart is unable to get Inliten to improve the quality of their holiday lighting, Wal-Mart may decide to go to a different vendor in order to retail higher-quality lighting products.

Summary of communication with Wal-Mart:
date we sent response
01/14/2007 paper mail sent to Wal-Mart too early to tell

 

What Will This Web Site Do Next?

Inliten has responded to our letters of 01/14/2007. They requested, and got from us, samples of the failed product. They agreed that the product had failed and they sent it for analysis.

But they have not provided technical information that we need to feel comfortable that the product is properly designed to be safe and long-lasting (as they advertise).

Our highest hope is that our attempts to contact Inliten will work out, and they will both replace the product and give us confidence that it is safe and won't fail again.

But, as time marches on, we do have numerous alternatives.

action status
More Research And Web Site Expansion pending result of e-mail exchange
Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Bureau Of Consumer Protection pending Inliten response
Underwriters Laboratories Inc. pending Inliten response
Consumer Product Safety Commission pending Inliten response

 

More Research And Web Site Expansion

If Inliten does not provide technical information, we will have to do the work ourselves, continuing to reverse-engineer their design and investigate its reliability.

And we love to publish our results.

What's next?

 

Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Bureau Of Consumer Protection

Bureau Of Consumer Protection is a department of the United States federal government. It is certainly concerned with products that might prove dangerous, but its most important function probably concerns truth in advertising.

Since Inliten advertises that its LED lights last for 25,000 hours, but but the product fails after a few months, their advertising claim is clearly false.

We might have to contact FTC soon.

 

Underwriters Laboratories Inc.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc. is a well-known independent organization that certifies products, chiefly being concerned with safety.

All of the holiday lighting products in question bear Underwriters Laboratories Inc. certification. They are all marked "DECORATIVE LIGHTING STRING", "FOR INDOOR OR OUTDOOR USE", and have a red UL holographic seal.

We might have to contact UL soon.

 

Consumer Product Safety Commission

The Consumer Product Safety Commission is a department of the United States federal government. It isn't particularly concerned with whether or not the product looks nice, but it is deeply concerned with products that might prove hazardous.

We might have to contact CPSC soon.

 

How You Can Help

If any of our readers happen to know something about poor lifetime of LED lighting products, especially holiday lighting, we would appreciate it if you would share this information by
contacting us.

We welcome additions and/or corrections from Inliten/NOMA, Wal-Mart, or other concerned organizations.

 

Investigation Time Line

date activity
12/09/2006 Sent e-mail to service@inliten.com.
12/14/2006 Sent e-mail to service@inliten.com.
12/21/2006 Sent e-mail to service@inliten.com.
01/07/2007 Began inventory: counting LEDs in each string; counting failures.
01/12/2007 Researched barcodes and UL certification.
01/14/2007 Sent paper mail to Inliten.
01/14/2007 Sent paper mail to Wal-Mart.
01/15/2007 Drew wiring diagram. Did math, indicating that LEDs get excess forward voltage.
01/18/2007 First draft of this web page goes live.
01/18/2007 Received phone message and e-mail from Matt at Inliten.
01/19/2007 Sent reply e-mail to Matt at Inliten.
01/19/2007 Got e-mail from Michael Sugar at Inliten.
01/19/2007 I reply to Michael Sugar's e-mail; point out three specific concerns with the product; request technical information.
01/19/2007 I talk to Matt on the phone.
01/22/2007 Michael Sugar responds to three concerns; does not provide further data; asks five questions on my usage.
01/23/2007 I reply to Michael Sugar's questions.
01/23/2007 Sent two sets of failed lights to Matt at Inliten.
01/29/2007 UPS delievers two sets of failed lights to Inliten.
01/31/2007 Michael Sugar acknowledges receipt of failed lights, agrees that there is a problem. "I will be sending these off to the lab for analysis and will update you as soon as we have some results."
02/01/2007 Dennis offers to help in the analysis; makes third request for technical information.
02/03/2007 Lack of reply to third request for technical information suggests that we have to get it on our own. Extended Burn-In Of 2006 Product begins.
02/07/2007 Revised and expanded version of this page goes online.

 

Other Web Sites

It looks like we aren't the only ones having problems with LED-based Christmas lights.

Terry Ritter's "LED Christmas Lights and How to Fix Them"

Terry Ritter has a page entitled "LED Christmas Lights and How to Fix Them" (
http://www.ciphersbyritter.com/RADELECT/LITES/LEDLITES.HTM).

Terry uses Philips-brand LED light strings.

The Philips products are electrically different from the Inliten product, but Terry has also had numerous failures.

LED Museum

Craig S. Johnson, of the LED Museum, has been looking into LED Christmas lights since 2000. His primary focus is then "Forever Bright" brand.

Craig is enthusiastic about the technology, but did note some failures, including loss of brightness over time.

http://ledmuseum.home.att.net/xmas1.htm

Réno-Dépôt LED lights recalled for shock, fire hazards

Friday, December 22, 2006:
http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/recalls/2006/12/renodepot_led_lights_recalled.html

LED Christmas lights recalled in Ontario

Monday, November 27, 2006:
http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/recalls/2006/11/led_christmas_lights_recalled.html

LED Christmas lights from Philips

Review and comments on Philips product:
http://led.linear1.org/led-christmas-lights-from-philips/1/
http://led.linear1.org/led-christmas-lights-from-philips/2/

 

Related Pages

You may be interested in these related pages:

----------

Thank you for visiting. Your comments are welcome.
[back] . . . [paper and pen] . . . [tip jar]

©Copyright 2007 by The Wolfstone Group. All rights reserved. You must read and abide by our terms of service.